… the field test data was required before a final decision could be made regarding the extended set of questions. It was concluded that it was beyond the scope of the WG to address the issue of dealing with…
… – in the range 7 – 10%. Using 2010 and 2011 NHIS data, algorithms for combining multiple domain questions into single domain indicators of disability and developing standards for determination of…
… sensitive policies and programmes. However, the incorporation of reliable and simply worded questions on disability, as part of wider household surveys and national census, can provide invaluable…
… a live recording of an Introductory training for Non-Government Organisations. At times some of the question and answer section may be hard to hear. If you need clarification please email WG_Secretariat…
… mention of whether an activity limitation is long-term or short-term in the Washington Group Questions and the trade-offs for including such a clause.
…Responses to surveys are very sensitive to how questions are worded. This blog summarizes the methodology recommended by the WG for translating the WG question sets in a manner that preserves the reliability of the data…
… estimating that 15% of the population has a disability, but most surveys using the Washington Group Questions get a lower rate. This blog explores the reasons behind this difference, and how it should be…
… of additional work on guidelines for analysis of data collected using the WG Short Set (SS) questions and Extended Set of questions on Functioning (ES-F) and updates from the workgroups dealing with…
… A Short History on the Question Sets Developed by the Washington Group In 2001, the International Seminar on the Measurement of Disability was held in New York. During this meeting participants agreed that…
… of disability data, the WG also provides guidance on the use of disability data including answers to questions frequently raised by data users. The links below will guide you to pages on the website where…